Given a choice of size, what are the best geometries for rocket life form AI entities on space tourism journeys? The remarkable point is that a size choice exists. The next question becomes at what diminutive or enlargement factor does a life form become out of bounds? For space born rockets dealing with the bonds of Earth's gravity, less mass is better. Therefore, a size reduction is beneficial to a rocket's propulsion through space.
A limit is determined by the size geometries of the electronics packages which include eyes, ears, and various sensors. On the average, based on experiments, this optimal size is centered around 2 to 2.5-inches. At 2.5, the transform must also harbor an exoskeleton to keep the the guts in. In terms of the exo, a lightweight structure is better to negate the forces acting upon the body using the formula F=MA where F is the force on the Exo, M is the mass weight of the Exo, and A is the acceleration acting upon the Exo. As the mass is reduced, at a constant acceleration, the force acting upon the body decreases. In this example, a printed skin Exo is entirely sufficient.